TECHNET Archives

January 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"ddsulliv" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 08 Jan 97 17:30:51 cst
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (154 lines)
          I forwarded your sludge issue to one of my fellow engineers. 
           Here is his reply.
          
          Dave Sullivan


______________________________ Forward Header __________________________________
Subject: Re[2]: Floating waste water treatment sludge
Author:  pmcarter at po5
Date:    1/8/97 5:16 PM


     Mr. Gould:
          I'd lean towards one of the possibilities mentioned by Mr. 
     Creager. Aqueous photoresist-containing stripper and developer 
     solutions and their rinses, when combined with the pH reduction step, 
     can make a low solubility, gummy, floating mass. In areas where the 
     option exists, I've always tried to pre-treat those resist waste 
     streams separately. Depending on the nature of your permit, 
     availability of separate tankage, and the contents of the resist 
     rinses, it may not be necessary to go through the metal-removal 
     portions of your treatment scheme with the resist-bearing streams.
                                             Marc Carter, ex-resist person
          
          
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Floating waste water treatment sludge
Author:  ddsulliv at po6
Date:    1/8/97 4:27 PM
          
          
          
          Here's your waste treat technet stuff.  Have fun 
          Dave
          
______________________________ Forward Header __________________________________
Subject: Re: Floating waste water treatment sludge
Author:  [log in to unmask] at ccmgw1
Date:    1/8/97 8:37 AM
          
          
To get a heavier sludge with a greater copper removal try using Ferric 
Chloride as the metal for the electron transfer. If your stream is 
typically  less than 100 ppm of copper coming in, Ferric Chloride (conc 
needed determined by jar tests) and lime above pH of 8 can yield  final 
water copper concentrations less than 100 ppb. If the pH is kept above 
12.5, a softening effect will take place and Calcium Chloride and 
Magnesium compounds will precipitate out and the copper will 
resolubilize.  Chelating agents in you waste stream will complex your 
metals and are difficult to break the bonds  to get the copper out of 
solution. There are some commercially available polymers that attach 
these chelates and then allow the Ferric compounds to work.
          
This type of treatment is typical of water treatment for large scale 
power plants which have very low discharge permits.
          
Dave Creager
Industrial Chemist
 ----------
From: Paul Gould
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Floating waste water treatment sludge 
Date: Tuesday, January 07, 1997 3:25PM
          
In message <[log in to unmask]>, 
[log in to unmask] writes
>I am having problems with floating sludge in my clarifier.  Instead of a 
>clarifier I have a desolved air flotation system.  The system is as follows: 
>- Continuous treatment system about (80 gpm) treating all printed circuit 
>board chemical manufacturing waste.
>- First step: the waste floes to a lift station where it is pumped into the 
>first treatment tank.
>-The first tank: The pH adjusted to 8.0 with caustic, 
>sodiumdimethyldithiocarbamate (DTC) is added to an ORP of around 0 mv.  Then 
>it flows by gravity to the second tank.
>- The second tank: Polyaluminium chloride, and an anionic polyelectrolyte is 
>added.  The treated solution then flows by gravity into the clarifier.
>
>I have tried different concentrations of anionic flocculent, it doesn't seem 
>to be a floccluent overdose.
          
If you have organic matter in the waste stream such as resist developers 
or strippers then this may be the stuff which is floating. Check the 
incoming stream. Otherwise it is flocc which has nothing to attach to. A 
small amount of flocc goes a very long way.
          
We treat with lime but first acidify to pH 2.5 with waste acid solutions 
to crack the metal ions, then add lime to pH 8.5 before pumping to a 
flocc dosing tank which sits on top of the clarifier. Flocc should be 
added just before settling otherwise it will be broken down and won't do 
the job. We consistently achieve a copper level of better than 2.5 ppm 
although this may not be acceptable where you are. All developer and 
stripper dumps are treated separately and by pass the main effluent 
treatment.
          
As someone else pointed out, lime only partially dissolves and is mostly 
in a slurry form which considerably aids settling. It will also attach to 
any surplus flocc and prevent carry over. It is a pain to use because it 
needs constant circulation and mixing to keep it in suspension but it 
does the job better than Caustic and is cheaper. We have a final band 
filter for removing any organic material and avoid dumping developer and 
stripper solutions into the effluent stream as these can contain 
complexing chemistry as well as a lot of organic material.
          
Hope this is of some help. Small scale lab simulation of your treament 
process can sometimes help but it is difficult to reproduce the full 
treatment process especially with a varaible waste stream.
          
Good luck
 --
Paul Gould
          
************************************************************************ 
***
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList 
v3.05 *
************************************************************************ 
***
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:
 *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.
 *
************************************************************************ 
***
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact
 *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]
 *
************************************************************************ 
***
          
*************************************************************************** 
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 * 
*************************************************************************** 
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           * 
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        * 
*************************************************************************** 
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   * 
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      * 
***************************************************************************
          

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2