Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0voyit-0000VhC; Mon, 27 Jan 97 15:36 CST |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 27 Jan 1997 15:44:24 -0600 |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Mon Jan 27 17: |
27:55 1997 |
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"1HgQP.0.dmG.A_Hxo"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
X-Mailer: |
Novell GroupWise 4.1 |
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Mr. Stewart,
In my experience, it is very difficult to consistently attach gold bonds
to a gold film 0.07 um (3 microinches) thick. Nickel tends to diffuse
through a gold layer this thin, oxidizing at the surface. Aluminum wedge
bonding seems to be more forgiving.
I believe that 0.5 um (20 microinches) pure (soft) gold is near the minimum
thickness that I would use for thermosonic gold bonding.
I think that the 5 um (200 microinches) of nickel is what the U.S. military
specified as a diffusion barrier for reliability purposes. I am not sure
about the reliability issues, but one can gold wire bond to 2.5 um (100
microinches) or less.
A reference text would be:
Reliability and Yield Problems of Wire Bonding in Microelectronics by
George Harman.
Dave Anderson
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|