TECHNET Archives

January 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0vnbuN-0000WVC; Thu, 23 Jan 97 21:02 CST
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Thu, 23 Jan 1997 22:11:44 -0500 (EST)
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/9572
From [log in to unmask] Fri Jan 24 08:
53:32 1997
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"-NAf41.0.Mm7.1P2wo"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
X-Loop:
Message-ID:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Dave,
I have been following your discussion on solderability (root causes of
excessive oxidation) and am lead to believe that if porous/thin tin leads are
"reworked" properly by these tinning houses we could avoid the many inventory
problems (storage time, slow moving parts, bagging with desicant, etc.) and
still maintain or improve solder connection reliability.
The eventual/ultimate solution being to get the OEM's with poor tinning
corrected or off the approved supplier list.
Am I over simplifying with this conclusion?
Steve Ross

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2