George-
     
     From Laura Turbini's IPC posting of 4/1/96 [quoted beleow], CAF is 
     conductive anodic filament, a failure mode in PWBs.
     
     I'll try to dig up references on CAF, if you're interested.
     
     [log in to unmask]
     
     [Laura Turbini of GA Tech wrote:]
     |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
     
     Ted,
     We have examined a failure mode known as CAF (conductive anodic 
     filament formation) and this situation sounds very much like it.  The 
     failure's we have observed are on FR-4 boards and polyimide should be 
     less  susceptible. 
     However, the voltage gradient you report in your note makes this a 
     possibility, at least worth
     looking at.
     
     The failure mechanism was first reported on in the mid to late 1970's 
     by Bell Labs.  We have
     recently observed this failure mechanism enhanced by chemicals in the 
     fusing fluid or soldering flux.
     Please e-mail me directly or phone me at (404)894-9073 to discuss.  I 
     would be interested in having a
     sample of the failured circuitry to analysis.
     
     Laura Turbini
     Georgia Institute of Technology
     Professor, Materials Science and Engineering
     ----------
     >From: TED JONES
     >To: TechNet
     >Subject: Military Polyimide Board Failures >Date: Friday, March 29, 
     1996 8:57AM
     >
     >The Navy has recently experienced field failures (shorts) on three 
     >7-layer polyimide PWBs.  The boards had operated for 300 hours in a 
     >sealed chamber.  The chamber is maintained at 50C, with constant 
     >humidity.
     >
     >The shorts (about 8 ohms of resistance) developed between a PTH and 
     >ground plane on layer 5.  There is a voltage potential of 30 volts 
     >(+15/-15) between the PTH and plane.  The clearance between the PTH's 
     >pad and the plane is 10 mils.
     >
     >Horizontal microsections of the failed areas do not show any obvious 
     >migration path.  The only anomaly noted on the failed pad is that it 
     >demonstrates much more pink ring than pads on adjacent PTHs.
     >
     >We're looking for ideas on the most likely cause of the shorts. >
     >Have there been any studies done that indicate pink ring will or will 
     >not contribute to this type of failure?
     >
     >Has anyone seen similar failures?
     >
     >
     
     


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Acronyms
Author:  [log in to unmask] at _internet
Date:    4/2/96 5:58 AM


Bring me up to speed here.  What does CAF stand for?  As used here talking 
about the polyamide failures topic of the week,
     
"This failure sounds like the "CAF" failure studied by Bell Labs in the late 
70's and early 80's."
     
     
     
  ====================================================================
                           George Franck
  PWB Product Assurance                     Phone (703) 560-5000 x2648 
  E-Systems M/S N408                              Fax   (703) 280-4613 
  7700 Arlington Blvd                  E-Mail: [log in to unmask] 
  Falls Church Va 22046                      E-Mail: [log in to unmask] 
  ====================================================================