TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Rory Doyle)
Date:
Thu, 21 Mar 1996 09:37:09 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (46 lines)
Kevin,

I have seen a case where residual sulphur on a circuit (left behind after a
cleaning stage) attacked the silver in the chip resistor component
terminations resulting in total open circuit failure of the resistors.
Exposed copper on SOIC leads etc. was also attacked in a similar manner.
The corrosion product was readily identifable as a black crystaline growth
at locations were there was exposed silver or copper.

Rory Doyle


 >
>        We are presently considering the use of carbon-impregnated
>     cardboard (for ESD) for the storage of small assemblies with Silver
>     and Gold Leads.
>        It is well understood in industry that Sulfur impairs the
>     solderability of the surface but does anyone know if sulfur has any
>     other detrimental affects on Silver and Gold finishes (i.e. corrosion,
>     etc.).  These pins will not be soldered therefore solderability of the
>     surface is not a concern.  We just want to confirm there is no other
>     detrimental affects of Sulfur.
>
>        Thanks for your time.
>
>     Kevin Frasier
>     Scientific-Atlanta
>     [log in to unmask]
>     http://www.Sciatl.com
>
>

-----------------------------------------------------

            Rory Doyle            [log in to unmask]

      National Microelectronics Research Centre,
                   Prospect Row,  Cork,  Ireland.
                     Direct Line: + 353 21 904110
 Switch: + 353 21  903000            Fax: + 353 21 270271
           Home page:    http://nmrc.ucc.ie/
------------------------------------------------------




ATOM RSS1 RSS2