Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Fri, 03 May 96 07:31:52 EST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I have had exactly that conversation with suppliers of direct plate
chemistries:
If a large nailhead is present, then part of it can be removed after
microetch, which is done AFTER key steps in the process. Microetch is
done after the application of the carbon/graphite in the Blackhole/
Shadow processes, & after the wetting agent conditioner in the
palladium systems. These can leave circumferential voids.
The recommendation was to perform a microetch before the key steps if
a Fab shop knows that it has nailheading.
MB
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Fab-Re: More nailheading
Author: [log in to unmask] at SMTPLINK-HADCO
Date: 5/2/96 05:07 PM
Other info on nailheading
Received a note on nailheading to the effect: What if a direct-plate process
was used and the undercutting that is required to remove the unwanted coating
also etched away the thin layer of copper at the extension of the nailhead.
Does this result in a circumferential void?. I believe it would; however, it
probably does not have have any relation to the often specified 150% of the
base foil thickness, and may also happen with a 125% nailhead.
Other incidental on nailheading: It is remembered that Bob Lomerson-ex Gen
Dynam-Ft. Worth has a patent on a nail heading process wherein he imposed on
the top of the drill stack during drilling a layer of another foil and
nailheaded (smeared) it all the way through the the hole thus eliminating
electroless processing.
Phil Hinton
hintpwb1.aol.com
|
|
|