TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uBajm-00004BC; Tue, 23 Apr 96 00:34 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Tue, 23 Apr 1996 01:38:52 -0400
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Message-ID:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/3579
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"lDbfE.0.uEK.Dl6Vn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 16:
30:13 1996
X-Loop:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
Our printed circuit manufacturing facility is currently investigating ways to
reduce the amount of water used in its rinsing operations.  I understand that
conductivity meters could be used to ascertain the amount of contamination
within the rinse water; however, is there a predefined limitation as to the
amount of contamination that would be considered acceptable before product
quality would be jeopardized.  In other words are there any established
guidelines to follow when attempting to regulate rinse water flow rates using
conductivity as the basis for water quality.  

Any assistance regarding water conservation would be greatly appreciated. 



ATOM RSS1 RSS2