Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vTwlh-0000S2C; Sat, 30 Nov 96 15:16 CST |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 30 Nov 96 21:26:10 UT |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Tue Dec 3 14: |
42:59 1996 |
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"-G3Uc3.0.GC7.SGAeo"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I am involved with an improved outerlayer registration method and am trying
to:
a) Correlate improved performance data that I have collected with the
theoretical accuracy limits.
b) Understand and quantify the tangible customer benefits of improved annular
ring tolerance.
I would appreciate any assistance to obtain the following information:
1) The typical distribution of drilling error.
2) Drill positional error (wander) as a function of the drill diameter.
3) Drill positional error (wander) as a function of stack height.
4) Drill life as a function of drill diameter.
5) Drilling tolerances that you experience.
6) Answers to any questions that an imaging person didn't think to ask about
drilling.
Of additional interest would be a function or spreadsheet that would model
drilling performance.
Thank you in advance:
Bert Ohlig
OLEC Corporation
[log in to unmask]
714 930 2500
714 930 2506 Fax
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|