 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0v8Rd8-0000TUC; Wed, 2 Oct 96 08:46 CDT |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=Iso-8859-1; name=body.txt |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 02 Oct 1996 08:43:00 -0600 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| >Received: |
by relay.thebureau.com (UUPC/extended 1.12p);
Wed, 02 Oct 1996 08:57:57 -0600 |
| Message-ID: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-Status: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"P3qaa3.0.izH.q8dKo"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| From [log in to unmask] Wed Oct 2 08: |
52:44 1996 |
| X-Mailer: |
MimeLink version 1.50B |
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I an interested in common practices for reject marking during the PC
manufacturing process. Presently, we are using several different techniques
depending upon the process and type of product. I would be great to have a
more universal method for marking rejects. Thanks in advance for any input.
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
