Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Mon, 22 Jul 1996 16:06:54 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>We are looking at replacing our 600SMD Omegameter with some other
>type of ionic cleanliness tester. We have reviewed the extensive study
>from EMPF on these types of testers (a good DOE.)
>
>As you may know, the 600 SMD isn't the most user-friendly machine in
>town. We are looking for real user experience with other machines to
>help us determine which setup will be best suited to our operation. We
>want to use wave room machine operations personnel to do the testing.
>These people are trained, but not to extreme levels. We currently have a
>Quality tech doing the testing, with backup from a QE when needed. We
>want to apply our QA resources in other areas, if a friendly ionic
>contamination tester is available.
>
>Does anyone know of a report or industry study on the useability of
>contamination testers? Personal experience in this area would be a great
> help to our decision making process.
>
>Thanks for any guidance you may be able to provide.
>
>Rick Vernon, Phoenix International, Fargo, ND
>rvernon@phoeintl
I'm decidedly biased, but I really like my Ionograph 500M SMDII,
and Dennis has just written much improved Windows software for it.
Karen Tellefsen
Alpha Metals
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|