Personally, I felt the Petroferm reply was appropriate. Especially for a
question that had such a broad spectrum of possible answers, this reply
could have been very useful for someone who is not familiar with the
electronics-cleaning playing field.
Larry Morse
Celwave R.F.
Corvallis, OR
[log in to unmask]
__________________________________________________
------------------------ INTERNET MAIL ------------------------
From: "Sharp, John" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: FW: Re[2]: FW: solder flux residue
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 1997 15:05 -0800
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jim,
I seems to me that there was some confusion regarding the Petroferm
notice. Since it didn't have the original message attached to it,
someone may have thought it was an unsolicited advertisement. I thought
that the Petroferm notice was within the bounds of good "Netiquette".
While I don't want ComplianceNet to turn into an advertising forum, to
think that only PWB manufacturers are capable of answering questions is a
little egotistical. In short, as long as the vendor is replying to a
posted question, I think that it is okay for it to be posted on
ComplianceNet.
What does everyone else think?
John Sharp
Merix Corp., Forest Grove, OR
503-992-4351 Telephone
503-359-1040 FAX
[log in to unmask]
----------
From: Thrush, Jim[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 1997 1:40 PM
To: johnsha; johnsha
Subject: Re[2]: FW: solder flux residue
Question about the compliance net:
I don't understand the tone of the response below regarding
'commercial messages.' Is there a rule against offering a solution
to
a compliancenetter who asks a question if the solution is a product
that you represent? Or is this response coming from someone outside
the compliance net? Or from someone who did not see the original
question that generated the response?
I thought the Petroferm response was a logical and considerate
response to the persons' request for help finding an ecologically
suitable flux residue solution.
Jim Thrush
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: FW: solder flux residue
Author: [log in to unmask] at internet
Date: 07/08/97 11:11 AM
Petroferm--
Please remove me from your email broadcast list and do not contact me
with commercial messages again.
Thank you.
On Mon, 7 Jul 1997 [log in to unmask] wrote:
> Petroferm offers a wide variety of cleaners for defluxing including
> semi-aqueous, aqueous, solvent and vapor degreasing options. Our
cleaning
> products are marketed under the tradenames BIOACT, AXAREL, RE-ENTRY and
> LENIUM. There are a number of possible processes which can be narrowed
> depending on the customer's existing equipment and requirements. Our
sales
> and marketing staff is very experienced at helping a customer make the
right
> choice for him or her. For more information on these products, please
call
> Petroferm (904-261-8286 and ask for Craig or Caroline). After the 16th
of
> July, I will be back from vacation and you can e-mail me or call me at
> 904-277-5239. Or you may contact our regional sales/technical manager
for
> the Colorado area - John Hoffman at 972-867-0367.
>
> Chris Fouts
**************************************************************************
* The mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
**************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
**************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the ComplianceNet forum, please call *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
**************************************************************************
|
