TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Date:
Thu, 31 OCT 96 08:19:46 MDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (77 lines)
No e-mail address attached for responses...



 ---------- Start of forwarded message ----------

                                                              Message#   233105
                                                        30-OCT-1996 19:46:50.53
From:   [log in to unmask] 
To:     [log in to unmask]
Subj:   ASSY: PCMCIA Vendor

Received: from micron.com by BOGEN7 Wed, 30 OCT 96 19:46:51 MDT
Received: from relay1.micron.com by micron.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id TAA14059; Wed, 30 Oct 1996 19:46:05 -0700
Received: from simon.ipc.org (IPC.ORG [168.113.24.64]) by relay1.micron.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA17953; Wed, 30 Oct 1996 19
:30:41 -0700 (MST)
Received: from ipc.org by simon.ipc.org via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI)
	 id UAA13816; Wed, 30 Oct 1996 20:34:10 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 20:34:10 -0800
Received: by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
	id m0vIl6o-0000YoC; Wed, 30 Oct 96 18:35 CST
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]
Old-Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
From: [log in to unmask]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 17:07:33 -0600
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: ASSY: PCMCIA Vendor
To: [log in to unmask]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: cc:Mail note part
Resent-Message-ID: <"XZqqf3.0.G-6.QH_To"@ipc>
Resent-From: [log in to unmask]
X-Mailing-List: <[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/7236
X-Loop: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]

     Address,

     I am in the process of looking for an Assembly vendor that is very,
     very established and confident in assembling Smart Cards (PCMCIAs) and
     testing Digital/RF smart cards via ICT.  I would prefer to hear from
     end users of the smart cards versus assembly houses.  The annual PCBA
     quantities are projected in the 300K+ range.  The assembly house will
     have to be capable of assembling the following:

     1. 2 side SMT
     2. 12mil pitch QFPs
     3. 0402, 0603 and 0805 chips in large quantities
     4. .028 +-.003 TYPE III PCMCIA
     5. Type I Assembly
     6. etc.

     Please forward any response to the attached email address.  Thank you
     in advance.


***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************


***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2