Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Wed, 18 Sep 1996 20:38:06 PST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
RE: Scott Westheimer's tarnish with OSP problem
Scott, this problem intrigues me because I see something almost
similar from time to time. I suspect you have a galvanic effect as
a previous reply suggested.
I sometines see bga's have one pad or several in the middle that
plate electroless nickel differently than the rest of the pads. It's
not
contamination because the same pad on both sides of the panel will
have the exact same appearance that looks like the pad has a thinner
deposit than it's kin.
My theory is it is caused by one or some pads being connected internally
to areas near the top of the circuit and others being connected to areas
deeper in the tank during plating. Then stratification or localized
depletion
in the chemistry causes a potential difference and hence different
plating
rates.
Your problem may be similar, in that gold and copper are quite different
in the hierarchy of metals. When you soak them in a conductive media
you create a battery. I would offer a guess that bringing the pH of the
OSP bath closer to neutral would help, and keeping the rinses as clean
as possible would help, especially the rinse after the microetch since it
is most likely quite conductive. (ie. use DI water if possible).
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|