Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | 18 Jul 1996 09:31:32 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Reply to: RE>>FWD>RE>ASSY revision J-STD-
Jeff,
The concern I would have about soldering directly to a chip components
electrical terminal is the bond strength of the electrical termination to the
ceramic. In my experience, I've observed quite a variation in bond strength
(tensile and clevage forces) between the metallizations and ceramic. If the
stress/strains can be eliminated/controlled, then I don't see any reason not
to do a direct component attach to a suitable area on the surface of the
printed board.
I wouldn't recommend doing the component attach to a solder resist over
conductors because (IMO) solder resist shouldn't be used as a primary
dielectric --- too many process variables.
IMO, it can/could be done --- go for it.
Ralph
--------------------------------------
Date: 7/18/96 9:11 AM
To: Ralph Hersey
From: [log in to unmask]
Ralph,
Your modification illustration assumes surface copper lands from which the
addedcomponent must be isolated. For small chip components and a little bit
of open real estate, what are your thoughts on bonding the component directly
to the
"main" pwb and then soldering the jumper wires to the component terminations?
Jeff
------------snip/snipped it all --------------------
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|