Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Wed, 17 Jul 1996 22:07:03 -0400 (EDT) |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I am resending his E-mail due to limited response. I would be very
interested in comment especially from electroless Ni/Au suppliers.
Dave
---------
>Recently a customer of ours has inquired as to what methods are recommended
>to determine solderability of non-electrolytic Au/Ni pwb's. In our
>discussion this customer claimed that immersion gold boards, as manufactured
>by the pwb manufacturer, soldered just fine, however during shipment and/or
>storage at the assembly site, solderability was degraded to a point that the
>colour of the solderable surface was, and I quote, "green in colour". I
>assume that this was due to oxidized Nickle migrating through the gold.
>
>Sounds like very low (<2-3 min) immersion thickness, and nickel migration
>
>
>It seems from the posting listed below that immersion gold finishes are
>intrinsically flawed from the perspective of solderability.
>
>Can anyone in electroless 'cyberspace' recommend answers to these questions? :
>
>1) What solderability test methods are recommended for these products?
>2) Is the IPC in the process of capturing these requirements?
>3) Is there an 'optimum' manufacturing/storage condition to minimize or
>hopefully eliminate solderability concerns?
>4) Is it implied that only ONE soldering process can be used with immersion
>gold finishes thereby precluding the use of double sided SMD?
>5) How accurate is the measurement of gold in the ranges typically quoted in
>immersion gold thicknesses (ie 2-6 microinches)? Is this measured by weight
>gain? XRF?
>
>Thanks for your feedback...
>
>Dave Rooke
>Circo Craft - Pointe Claire
>[log in to unmask]
>
>____________________ reply separator _______________________
>>
>>| Hi!
>>|
>>| Accelerated aging factor for a new PCB surface finish?
>>| Do you mean
>>| oxidation? Intermetallic growth? What type of finish?
>>| Please send
>>| additional detailed info covering your request.
>>|
>>|
>>|
>>| Dave Hillman
>>
>>Hi Dave,
>>
>>In this case the new PCB suface finish is electroless Ni/immersion Au. And
>>you are right, it is oxidation - under extreme and/or even normal storage
>>condition, Ni has the tendency to diffuse through Au layer (if there is
>>any porosity) and gets oxidized on the top of Au layer, then the
>>solderability will be affected due to the existance of nickel oxide on the
>>top of Au layer.
>>
>>So far I have not found any mathimatical model (either physical or
>>experimental)for acceralated aging factor as the function of time in aging
>>chamber, temperature in aging chamber, and relative humidity level in
>>aging chamber, although I have found several aging method. But none of
>>them provide corresponding aging factor. By aging factor, I mean the
>>ratio between the time in chamber and the time in normal storage
>>environment, with same level of solderability degradation.
>>
>>Thanks in advance for your advice.
>>
>>
>>Nora
>>
>>***************************************************************************
>>* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
>>***************************************************************************
>>* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
>>* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
>>***************************************************************************
>>
>>
>>
>D. Rooke
>([log in to unmask])
>
>***************************************************************************
>* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
>***************************************************************************
>* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
>* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
>***************************************************************************
>
>
>
>
>
D. Rooke
([log in to unmask])
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|