 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uGQkU-00009CC; Mon, 6 May 96 08:54 CDT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Mon, 6 May 1996 10:00:59 -0400 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Wed May 15 14: |
26:56 1996 |
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"uGA7S3.0.qG8.fIWZn"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I recently heard that IPC and MIL specs no longer require water marks on
rigid laminate. If so, which specs / revisions?
|
|
|
