TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Mon, 6 May 1996 08:04:07 -0400
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/3837
From [log in to unmask] Wed May 15 14:
26:06 1996
X-Sender:
gary@gateway
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
X-Loop:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"BmWsF.0.mS7.uJVZn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Gary Ferrari <[log in to unmask]>
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uGPhl-0000CKC; Mon, 6 May 96 07:47 CDT
Cc:
X-Mailer:
Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
Randy;

I believe that the customer is calling out for IPC-D-949. This is the
obsolete design standard that was replaced by IPC-D-275, in 1991. The solder
coat thickness, back then was 0.0003 inch. In the present standard, we call
for coverage to meet the soderability requirements og J-STD-003.

At 04:16 PM 5/2/96 PDT, [log in to unmask] wrote:
>I have a customer specification requirement to inspect solder coating 
>thickness per IPC-D-949 Class 2.  I reviewed the Design Guide and did not 
>find any solder coat thickness requirements.
>
>Where in this IPC spec is the solder coat thickness requirements?
>
>What is the relationship of IPC-D-949 and IPC-D-275?
>
>If I use the solder coat thickness in IPC-D-275, do I meet the 
>requirements of IPC-D-949?
>
>Your help is appreciated.
>
>Randy Reed
>Merix Corporation
>[log in to unmask]
>
>
Regards,

Gary Ferrari
Tech Circuits
(203)269-3311
[log in to unmask]



ATOM RSS1 RSS2