TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uF7vC-0000CCC; Thu, 2 May 96 18:36 CDT
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Thu, 2 May 1996 16:41:12 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
MIME-Version:
1.0
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/3801
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
From [log in to unmask] Fri May 3 08:
49:55 1996
Resent-Message-ID:
<"LBDSP.0.Qc9.zRKYn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Thomas Stewart <[log in to unmask]>
X-Status:
X-Loop:
Message-ID:
<Pine.3.89.9605021602.A8380-0100000@netcom18>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (24 lines)
Hi all,
Does anyone have experience with soldermask on teflon?

Is there any information or specification on acceptance criteria for 
bubbles in mask along traces for teflon material specifically?

We have very good adhesion, but on a random basis we will get very small 
(less than .005") hard surfaced bubbles. They will not propagate or break 
with heat.

We use a very gentle bake cycle -- 6 hours with 2 ramps, but the skin on 
the mask just will not allow all the volatiles to escape without causing 
the soldermask to bubble.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Stewart
Speedy Circuits                              Phone: 714-891-9441
5292 System Dr.                              Fax:   714-895-8485
Huntington Beach, Ca  92649                  Email: [log in to unmask]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------



ATOM RSS1 RSS2