TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uF5FB-00007lC; Thu, 2 May 96 15:44 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Thu, 2 May 1996 16:49:40 -0400
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/3797
From [log in to unmask] Thu May 2 16:
02:20 1996
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"rV9rj3.0.5nA.8xHYn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
X-Loop:
Message-ID:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Other info on nailheading 

Received a note on nailheading to the effect: What if a direct-plate process
was used and the undercutting that is required to remove the unwanted coating
also etched away the thin layer of copper at the extension of the nailhead.
 Does this result in a circumferential void?. I believe it would; however, it
probably does not have have any relation to the often specified 150% of the
base foil thickness, and may also happen with a 125% nailhead.      

Other incidental on nailheading:  It is remembered that Bob Lomerson-ex Gen
Dynam-Ft. Worth  has a patent on a nail heading process wherein he imposed on
the top of the drill stack during drilling a layer of another foil and
nailheaded (smeared) it all the way through the the hole thus eliminating
electroless processing.

Phil Hinton
hintpwb1.aol.com  



ATOM RSS1 RSS2