TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uF4Cr-0000BsC; Thu, 2 May 96 14:38 CDT
Encoding:
19 TEXT
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Thu, 02 May 96 15:15:00 DST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Message-ID:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/3794
TO:
"'IPC Technet Input'" <[log in to unmask]>
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"fCmnE3.0.m6I.qyGYn"@ipc>
From [log in to unmask] Thu May 2 14:
45:40 1996
From:
"Dill, Norm J" <[log in to unmask]>
X-Loop:
Subject:
X-Mailer:
Microsoft Mail V3.0
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)

    Our air conditioning system here mixes in a large volumes of outside air 
to help control the inside temperature while economizing on energy costs. 
 As a result, the inside and outside humidity levels are very similar.
     Our PWB s (FR4 & polyimide) are purchased and stored with desiccant 
included in each package of 10.  At best, this results in slightly higher 
costs from our suppliers, extra handling in our stock room and later baking 
steps.
    We are considering restructuring our PWB stocking procedures.
    Does anyone have pro/con examples of board storage in this kind of 
environment?  For example, does the desiccant actually keep the boards from 
absorbing moisture during high humidity days?  What would be expected if the 
boards were wrapped/stored in slip sheets and bound with duct tape or left 
open on the shelf?  If the humidity was controlled, could the desiccant and 
some baking steps be eliminated without an increase in warpage problems.
     Any opinions, examples or references will be appreciated.

     Norm Dill
     [log in to unmask]



ATOM RSS1 RSS2