TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uDz27-00007YC; Mon, 29 Apr 96 14:54 CDT
Encoding:
31 Text
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Mon, 29 Apr 96 15:56:39 CST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
From [log in to unmask] Wed May 1 14:
33:27 1996
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/3719
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"kNq6b.0.Eu8.FwHXn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
X-Status:
X-Loop:
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
     
     What is the mfr and pn?
     
     What's the environment:
     
                              high particulate?
                              cable flexing?
                              air flow/no air flow?
                              drastic temp swings?


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: DES> Connector Reliability
Author:  [log in to unmask] at internet-mail
Date:    4/29/96 12:37 PM


We have a header in a prototype system with brass sprung contacts with gold 
plate over nickel, contacting pins which are also gold-plate over nickel.
     
This connector carries 3A, and is showing a strong tendency to increase in 
contact resistance in field tests (up to 150 mOhm). Removing and refitting 
the connector takes the contact resistance back to "as new" (<40 m Ohm).. The 
connectors have been examined by a test lab and pronounced OK, with no 
contamination. No deposit or oxidation is visible on the surface.
     
Has anyone seen similar failure mechanism? What's the physics?
     
     
Terry Davey --------------------------------  [log in to unmask]  ------
     



ATOM RSS1 RSS2