 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Mon, 29 Apr 1996 08:44:27 -0400 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Wed May 1 14: |
21:05 1996 |
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| X-Sender: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-Status: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"7FXaX1.0.3qA.SVBXn"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uDsC5-00007YC; Mon, 29 Apr 96 07:36 CDT |
| X-Mailer: |
Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4 |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Would like input on the subject of 1 oz. vs. 2 oz copper thickness on inner
layers. What types of end products would be affected if 1 oz. were
substituted for 2 oz? What design considerations are most critical? Is it
safe to say that 1 oz. vs. 2 oz. should no longer be an issue?
Thank you for input.
Gary Longman
Electropac
|
|
|
