Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uCuCr-0000DMC; Fri, 26 Apr 96 15:33 CDT |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 26 Apr 96 13:38:28 PST |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"E9plX.0.beD.TCJWn"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Wed May 1 12: |
59:29 1996 |
X-Loop: |
|
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
What percent ratio of the foil is the nailheading? The chipload for
the 0.0135 may be aggressive. How do the drill bits look after use?
Are non-functional pads present? For the smaller hole sizes, 14 to 26
ounces of copper per hole is a lot to ask for from a drill.
How is the cure on the material?
What kind of backup and entry material?
Drilling machine Type?
Stack Height for the 104 mil material is 2 high?
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Random Nailheading
Author: [log in to unmask] at corp
Date: 4/26/96 1:10 PM
Problem:
Random Nailheading within a X-section with layer-to-layer variations
(example: Layer 5 good, layer 6: left side bad, right side good...)
Also some half-nailheading (into B-stage side, but not C-stage side).
No resin smear or post-sep detected. Bits used are new & 1st repoints
only with 1500 hits max (Tycom).
Product: 8-12 layers, stack height 2, thickness 62-104 mils, FR4
Typical Parameters:
.0135" dia, 100krpm, 111 ipm infeed, 800 retract
.033" dia, 66.6krpm, 173 ipm infeed, 800 retract
Any advice would be appreciated.
|
|
|