 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uCSlD-00008RC; Thu, 25 Apr 96 10:15 CDT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Thu, 25 Apr 1996 11:19:56 -0400 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| From [log in to unmask] Wed May 1 09: |
29:38 1996 |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"TwO_72.0.PO9.-RvVn"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Is it possible that the problem is coming from soldermask residues that the
developer did not remove?? This would account for it not occuring in large
pad areas, as the developer may have trouble getting into the very small
areas.
Rudy Sedlak
RD Chemical
|
|
|
