 
| X400-Content-Type: |
P2-1988 ( 22 ) |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
25 Apr 1996 09:08:17 -0500 |
| X-Status: |
|
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Conversion: |
Allowed |
| Disclose-Recipients: |
Prohibited |
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Status: |
O |
| Priority: |
normal |
| X-Loop: |
|
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| Content-Return: |
Allowed |
| X400-MTS-Identifier: |
[/c=US/admd=MCI/prmd=Honeywell/; 072B7317F8751078-HW-MTA-AZ] |
| TO: |
|
| Message-Id: |
<072B7317F8751078*/c=US/admd=MCI/prmd=Honeywell/o=AZ-MTA/ou=MSMail/ou=CAS/s=Edwards/g=Ted/i=A/@MHS> |
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X400-Originator: |
|
| X400-Recipients: |
non-disclosure; |
| From [log in to unmask] Wed May 1 09: |
27:14 1996 |
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uCReI-000079C; Thu, 25 Apr 96 09:03 CDT |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"2fNam.0.ze5.EPuVn"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Alternate-Recipient: |
Allowed |
| X400-Received: |
by /c=US/admd=MCI/prmd=Honeywell/; converted ( IA5-Text);
Relayed; 25 Apr 1996 09:08:17 -0500
by mta HW-MTA-AZ in /c=US/admd=MCI/prmd=Honeywell/; converted (
IA5-Text); Relayed; 25 Apr 1996 09:08:17 -0500 |
| Original-Encoded-Information-Types: |
IA5-Text |
| Content-Identifier: |
072B7317F8751078 |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
We are looking for a tool to give to our engineers before they hand off
a design to the design group that would allow them to assess trade offs of
their PWB. They are always asking questions like , if I go pads only and
add two more layers is my board less expensive(e.g. 16 layers instead of 14
layers)? We wonder if anyone has such a tool and would share it. Coomb's
has a simple one in the new edition and we like the idea of a point count
system, but the one in the book is too simplistic as we deal in 10 layers
minimum, two to three different controlled impedance's in the same board, 16
mil holes, 25 mil pitch, etc. If anyone has such a matrix and will share
it, please send to:
Ted Edwards
Honeywell
Box 21111, Mail Stop V16C3
Phoenix, AZ. 85036
Thanks
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|
