 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Thu, 25 Apr 1996 21:00:05 +0800 (MYT) |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| X-Sender: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| From [log in to unmask] Wed May 1 09: |
22:48 1996 |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"aFnt03.0._u5.gQtVn"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uCQbj-00006eC; Thu, 25 Apr 96 07:57 CDT |
| X-Mailer: |
Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.1.2 |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Recently we encounter exposed copper problem after electroless nickel gold
process ,
we wish to know if there any way to determine the stubborn film on top of
the copper
that prevent the plating to take place . We understand that soldermask on pad or
poor rinsing after final development could give rise to such problem . Such
problem
of soldermask on pad could be easily found after HAL but cases of minor
soldermask
on pad could not be detected in HAL . Please advise .
|
|
|
