 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uC5Fr-00008hC; Wed, 24 Apr 96 09:09 CDT |
| Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
| Old-Return-Path: |
<buetmi> |
| Date: |
Wed, 24 Apr 1996 09:09:11 -0500 (CDT) |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| cc: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-Status: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"xf_691.0.c3M.AOZVn"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 17: |
04:50 1996 |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Message-ID: |
<Pine.3.89.9604240932.A93148-0100000@ipc> |
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Stephen,
I would refer to Table 3 of IPC-RB-276, amendment 1 (published 11/94), for
gold or other plating/coating thickness requirements. This is the most
recently published IPC standard for finished plating.
Mike Buetow
IPC Technical Staff
2215 Sanders Road
Northbrook, IL 60062
P: 847-509-9700, ext. 335
F: 847-509-9798
[log in to unmask]
On Wed, 24 Apr 1996, Stephen Cooper wrote:
> Can anyone supply a specification to call up when requesting a Gold
> Flash finish on a PWB and is it worth it today, with the advances
> with the HASL finishes.
>
> Regards
>
> Stephen Cooper
> Manufacturing Projects Manager
> SCITEC LIMITED
> Apollo Place
> Lane Cove NSW 2066
> Australia
> PH : +612 428 9500
> Fax : +612 428 9589
> Email : [log in to unmask]
>
>
|
|
|
