Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uBM4v-00007kC; Mon, 22 Apr 96 08:54 CDT |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 22 Apr 1996 09:59:32 -0400 |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"pNmfK3.0.aCK.l-uUn"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 16: |
17:28 1996 |
X-Loop: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 96-04-19 18:44:38 EDT, you write:
>Hello Jack - we have had good success with perimeter heating via 4
> independent nozzles on 20 and 25 mil pitch parts using nitrogen. We
> did have to do a considerable amount of process characterization for
> our pwa population but the system works well.
I've always wondered, is a 25 mil pitch part a part that is consistently made
so that 25 out of every 1,000,000 are thrown out (pitched)? It would seem to
me that you would want a lower pitch part to be more economical. I guess
that must be why the industry is going to 15 mil pitch parts - you throw out
10 less per every million!.
So smart it hurts.
|
|
|