 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uAKtu-00006jC; Fri, 19 Apr 96 13:27 CDT |
| Encoding: |
11 TEXT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Fri, 19 Apr 96 13:31:00 CDT |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"GDkZV2.0.r2N.9izTn"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 16: |
08:29 1996 |
| X-Loop: |
|
| X-Mailer: |
Microsoft Mail V3.0 |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I am investing in a fine pitch rework station for low volume placement and
rework of .020 in. c-c PQFP parts. I am interested in users experience with
variable perimeter heating vs nozzle heating. Which type of heating have
you had the better results using? Any other related comments would be
appreciated.
Thanks,
Jack Tippit
Wilcox Electric
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|
