TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0u9wHl-00007jC; Thu, 18 Apr 96 11:10 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Thu, 18 Apr 1996 12:15:06 -0400
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/3525
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 15:
54:14 1996
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"EUsic2.0.WbG.ibcTn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
X-Loop:
Message-ID:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Tracy,

While at Naval Avionics we experimented extensively
with electrolytic tin plating in late 1980's.  We tried
numerous ways of minimizing undercut including
starting with 1/4 oz foil and selectively plating the 
tin areas then etching with no protection to the other
copper conductors.  You only have to remove the 1/4
oz copper so etching is very fast.  Of course this
works on paper and on prototypes, but when you
get to actual production with the variations in
plating thicknesses and all the other subtle miriad
variations - you get slivers.

I spent a lot of time manually brushing boards to remove
the slivers just to salvage boards for engineering 
development.

Sorry my response isn't more positive than the last.

Susan Mansilla
Robisan Laboratory
317-353-6249



ATOM RSS1 RSS2