Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0u9ZXV-0000ScC; Wed, 17 Apr 96 10:53 CDT |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 17 Apr 1996 09:57:17 -0600 |
Precedence: |
list |
X-Loop: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
From [log in to unmask] Thu Apr 25 09: |
55:24 1996 |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"ofkbB3.0.NhF.WFHTn"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Resent-From: |
|
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I want to evaluate the possibility of converting to a 100% tin electroplate
finish on PCBs that requires a tin or tin-lead for contact pads. Primarily
72 pin SIMM memory modules which are destined for use in tin or tin-lead
(usually high tin content 90/10 - 95/5 tin-lead alloy).
Overall thickness is an issue with SIMM products (.050" + .004" -.003"). The
HAL process results in a adequate finish most of the time, however this process
can not be tightly controlled and is a root cause for thickness rejects and
contact rel problems.
I've a couple of goals:
1) Improve quality and performance of our product by improving contact
reliability.
2) Give our PCB suppliers a way to improve yields for overall thickness.
There are other pluses (for us and the PCB suppliers) associated with a
conversion to tin that I won't bring up. I'm primarily concerned with
overcoming any potential quality or reliability problems. Here are some
of my concerns:
1) Tin whisker growth. Dependent on stress induced during electroplating.
Low/no stress plating is critical. Whisker growth begins at ~50 'C.
Spacing between contact pads on a 72 pin SIMM is .010" so whisker growth
has to be eliminated. Whiskering is not a problem with lead present.
Test conditions: High temperature storage, 150 'C unbiased. Length ?
1080 hrs 125 'C high temp operating life, biased.
85/85 APB T&H
2) Tin undercut must be minimized to prevent tin slivers.
3) Solderability, tin-oxides form readily at room temperature. This problem
exists with HAL, but to a lesser same extent.
4) Copper-tin intermetallic growth, tin should be a minimum of 200 microinches
thick. Again, this problem exists with HAL.
Test conditions: Same as in #1.
************************************************************
My question is, has anyone experience with a tin electroplate finish in a
similar application? Any potential problems I've overlooked?
All comments are appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Tracy Tennant ([log in to unmask])
ph (208) 368-5963
|
|
|