TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Tue, 16 Apr 1996 17:07:33 -0500
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/3472
X-Sender:
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
X-Loop:
From [log in to unmask] Wed Apr 24 11:
04:39 1996
Subject:
From:
Leo Reynolds <[log in to unmask]>
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0u9IrS-000072C; Tue, 16 Apr 96 17:04 CDT
Resent-Message-ID:
<"ZpLC8.0.2b6.mb1Tn"@ipc>
X-Mailer:
Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
We have a customer who says that a previous supplier had problems soldering
some fine pitch components (15 mil) because the lead material was "Alloy
42".  They had a tin/lead coating (85/15).  They were also told that many
component mfgrs are going to be using this material.

We are not familiar with this lead material but since it is solder coated do
not hink it should be a problem.  Anyone have any knowledge or experience in
this area?  

Thanks in advance for your consideration.

Leo Reynolds
Electronic Systems, Inc.



ATOM RSS1 RSS2