TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Tue, 16 Apr 1996 16:24:00 -0500
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/3471
TO:
X-Url:
http://www.ipc.org/pwbind/message.htm
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
X-Status:
X-Loop:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"IHVTz2.0.MVA.lu0Tn"@ipc>
From [log in to unmask] Wed Apr 24 11:
04:09 1996
Subject:
From:
Kevin Facinelli <[log in to unmask]>
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0u9I6y-00004HC; Tue, 16 Apr 96 16:16 CDT
X-Mailer:
Mozilla 2.0 (Win95; I)
Organization:
Rockwell
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
MIL-55110 HAS A REQUIREMENT, PARA. 3.6.2.1.1 THAT REQUIRES MINIMUM 
ANNULAR RING OF 0.002" ON INTERNAL PADS. DOES ANYONE HAVE DATA THAT THEY 
CAN SHARE WHICH DEMONSTRATES THE RELIABILITY OR UNRELIABILITY OF PLATED 
HOLE BREAK OUT OR TANGENCY TO THE INTERNAL PADS. DOES ETCHBACK AFFECT 
RELIABILITY ON PTH'S WITH BREAKOUT? 


Kevin Facinelli
Rockwell Collins Printed Circuits
400 Collins Rd NE
Cedar Rapids, IA 52498
P: 319-395-1594
[log in to unmask]



ATOM RSS1 RSS2