TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0u7nUP-00008cC; Fri, 12 Apr 96 13:22 CDT
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Fri, 12 Apr 1996 12:59:04 -0400
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
From [log in to unmask] Fri Apr 12 14:
02:05 1996
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/3426
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
X-Status:
X-Loop:
Content-Description:
cc:Mail note part
Subject:
From:
Mime-Version:
1.0
Resent-Message-ID:
<"mp6BV.0.ttH.fzfRn"@ipc>
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
  Hello!
  
  Is there any knowledge of flux, excessive fluxing, flux residue or any issues 
  with any No Clean flux causing problems, any problems to stacked film 
  capacitors? In particular, stacked film, high voltage type, naked or un-cased 
  capacitors manufactured by several companies. 
  
  Any customers feed back to manufacture's regarding flux causing contamination 
  or electrical degradation during or after the soldering process?
  
  
  _____________________________________
  
  Jim Goss
  Process Engineer
  Vicor Corp.
  Phone: (508) 749-7661
  FAX:   (508) 749-7807
  email: [log in to unmask]



ATOM RSS1 RSS2