 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Fri, 12 Apr 1996 12:21:01 -0600 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Fri Apr 12 13: |
19:26 1996 |
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| X-Sender: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"ihDb-.0._LJ.2nfRn"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0u7nHO-000080C; Fri, 12 Apr 96 13:09 CDT |
| X-Mailer: |
<PC Eudora Version 1.4> |
| Message-Id: |
<199604121821.MAA18412@lac> |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Can anyone inform me of the current status of the military requirement re:
etchback? A potential customer's blueprint references 55110D and
specifically calls out for etchback on type 3 boards (multilayer). However,
the board will have a commercial application and, as is common with
blueprint notes, this may be of the "boilerplate" variety. They may be
satisfied with desmear with a little education and persuasion. Thanks to
any who respond.
Lyle Anderson
Electrostar-Utah Division (formerly Lundahl Astro Circuits
Phone 801-753-4700 ext. 3040
|
|
|
