 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 17 Jan 1996 09:44:16 -0800 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Wed Jan 17 13: |
41:20 1996 |
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| X-Sender: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"RVilq2.0.6ZD.IOJ_m"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0tcbwr-0000ORC; Wed, 17 Jan 96 11:47 CST |
| X-Mailer: |
Windows Eudora Version 1.4.3 |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
We've done very similar things to accomidate alternate parts. The solder
paste deposited through our 8 mil thick stencils and then reflowed, has
produced good solder joints in all cases.
>
>I'm a pcb designer. I have a customer that needs the option of using either
>a .3 wide or .4 wide 32 pin j-leaded part in the same location.
>
>These are only prototype boards and small quantity. Probably won't be
reflowed.
>
>Question:
>
>In order to accomodate both parts the footprint is going to be extra long.
>What problems will be encountered soldering the part to the board? Will the
>solder wickup onto the j-lead properly?
>
>Any suggestions?
>
>--------------------------------------
>Larry L. Pucket
>Sandia National Labs.
>Dept. 9784 MS/0624
>P.O. Box 5800
>Albuquerque, NM 87185-0624
>
>Email: [log in to unmask]
>Phone: (505) 844-1711
>Fax: (505) 844-7428
>
>
>
Bryan Woods
Manufacturing Engineer
Parker Compumotor
Phone: (707)584-2542
FAX: (707)584-8015
Email: [log in to unmask]
|
|
|
