TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0u6JQN-00006mC; Mon, 8 Apr 96 11:04 CDT
Encoding:
33 Text
From [log in to unmask] Mon Apr 8 11:
42:34 1996
Date:
Mon, 08 Apr 96 11:10:59 CST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/3329
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"q949P2.0.30C.-ZJQn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Old-Return-Path:
X-Loop:
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
     
     Andy,
     
     Could you provide:
     
     conductor normal voltage level, normal amperage level, and
     what type fuse - fast-blo/slo-blo, 32V/250V, amperage?
     
     Doug McKean
     
     [log in to unmask]


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: DES: Conductor Widths for High Current Conditions
Author:  [log in to unmask] at internet-mail
Date:    4/8/96 10:04 AM


          Can anyone provide guidance on the design of a conductor 
          width such that it will not be damaged by a high current 
          spike.  I want to feel confident that, if a short occurs in 
          the system, the conductor will not degrade before the
          fuse has a chance to do it's thing.  So, this is not really 
          a derating question as much as one of short term overload.
     
          Thank You,
     
          Andy Pedersen
          Harris Corp.
          [log in to unmask]
     
     



ATOM RSS1 RSS2