TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From [log in to unmask] Wed Apr 3 17:
48:28 1996
Old-Return-Path:
<simon.ipc.org!nicmad.nicolet.com!nicmad.nicolet.com!mcguine>
Date:
Wed, 03 Apr 1996 08:30:49 -0600
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/3280
X-Sender:
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"g_k0Q3.0.ZrC.gueOn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Pat McGuine)
X-Loop:
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0u4Tkp-00006kC; Wed, 3 Apr 96 08:41 CST
X-Mailer:
Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
Can you be more specific.  What types of components are on the board?

At 11:37 4/3/96 +0800, Chan Yong Kwee wrote:
>Good day,
>        We have encountered a low solder paste level in the printing
>process.  We are using a Metal squeegee on a Metal Screen to print the
>solder paste onto the PCB before SMT processes.  
>        We were wondering whether the solder paste viscosity is too thick;
>or there is a Stencil Design fault.  The SPC chart states the solder paste
>thickness should be between 6.5 mil to 8.5 mil.  But we can only achieve
>only up to 6.2 mil of solder paste thickness.  Our stencil is 6.0 mil in
>thickness.
>        Can anyone give me the specifications on the design of Metal
>Stencils and give suggestions on how to solve the above problems? Thank you.
>
>Regards,
>Chan Yong Kwee
>E-mail:[log in to unmask]
>Tel    : (65) 746-6617
>Pg     : 9-490-6514
>
>
>

-Pat-

-------------
Patrick McGuine
Nicolet Instrument
[log in to unmask]
(608) 276-6334



ATOM RSS1 RSS2