TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From [log in to unmask] Wed Apr 3 17:
02:10 1996
References:
Date:
Tue, 02 Apr 1996 14:08:41 -0800
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/3256
TO:
TED JONES <[log in to unmask]>
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
X-Status:
X-Loop:
Old-Return-Path:
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0u44my-00006eC; Tue, 2 Apr 96 06:02 CST
Resent-Message-ID:
<"FtIP73.0.hbD.BTHOn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Cc:
X-Mailer:
Mozilla 2.0 (Win16; I)
Organization:
TADIRAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD.
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
TED JONES wrote:
> 
> The Navy has recently experienced field failures (shorts) on three
> 7-layer polyimide PWBs.  The boards had operated for 300 hours in a
> sealed chamber.  The chamber is maintained at 50C, with constant
> humidity.
> 
> The shorts (about 8 ohms of resistance) developed between a PTH and
> ground plane on layer 5.  There is a voltage potential of 30 volts
> (+15/-15) between the PTH and plane.  The clearance between the PTH's
> pad and the plane is 10 mils.
> 
> Horizontal microsections of the failed areas do not show any obvious
> migration path.  The only anomaly noted on the failed pad is that it
> demonstrates much more pink ring than pads on adjacent PTHs.
> 
> We're looking for ideas on the most likely cause of the shorts.
> 
> Have there been any studies done that indicate pink ring will or will
> not contribute to this type of failure?
> 
> Has anyone seen similar failures?

  Is there a chance that you are seeing  the CAF phenomenon ?
   good luck
    [log in to unmask]



ATOM RSS1 RSS2