 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Fri, 29 Mar 1996 11:43:19 -0800 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| X-Sender: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"rLTq92.0.5CA._n3Nn"@ipc> |
| From [log in to unmask] Wed Apr 3 16: |
35:41 1996 |
| From: |
|
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0u2k1R-00009qC; Fri, 29 Mar 96 13:39 CST |
| Subject: |
|
| X-Mailer: |
Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4 |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
We are struggling with the interpretation of IPC-D-275 paragraph 5.3.1.5.
One group is arguing that this paragraph discussing cross-hatched areas only
applies to external layers and the other group feels that it should apply to
all layers.
What say gang?
|
|
|
