Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0u2je5-00007JC; Fri, 29 Mar 96 13:15 CST |
Encoding: |
29 TEXT |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 29 Mar 96 12:19:00 MST |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
X-Loop: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"1driO.0.asF.OR3Nn"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Cc: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Wed Apr 3 16: |
35:35 1996 |
X-Mailer: |
Microsoft Mail V3.0 |
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I try to use [ReplyAll] but I still don't believe that this does a
broadcast reply to all.
DS
----------
>From: TechNet-request
>To: hadyle
>Cc: TechNet
>Subject: Can This Improvement to TechNet be Made?
>Date: Friday, 29 March, 1996 8:13AM
>
>I have recently subscribed to TechNet and have noticed that although
>many questions are asked I don't see all of the responses that I would
>expect.
>
>When I use the "REPLY" function of email, the original TechNet
>submitter's address (the question asker) appears on the
>(send reply) TO: line and not the TechNet (forum) address. I suspect
>that some responses never get on the TechNet forum because of this.
>
>Can't this be changed so that the mail sent out via the TechNet forum
>has the default "Reply TO" address of [log in to unmask] ?
>
>If this is not possible, please reiterate to all subscribers, "Send
>responses to [log in to unmask] and copy the original submitter.
>
>
>
>
|
|
|