 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0u2iGY-0000AcC; Fri, 29 Mar 96 11:47 CST |
| Encoding: |
25 TEXT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Fri, 29 Mar 96 12:51:00 EST |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"FRv8.0.DjE.X82Nn"@ipc> |
| From [log in to unmask] Wed Apr 3 16: |
31:24 1996 |
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| X-Mailer: |
Microsoft Mail V3.0 |
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Harlan,
What type of flux and cleaning process are you using?
----------
From: TechNet-request
To: TechNet
Subject: Nickel/Gold Immersion
Date: Friday, March 29, 1996 8:10AM
We have experienced dramatic yield improvements in SMT by
utilizing Nickel/Gold (2-6 micro-inches of Gold over 100
micro-inches of Nickel) instead of Tin/Lead(HASL) on our Printed
Wiring Boards. Due to Mixed Technology Designs, several of these
Designs are processed through Wave-Solder. We have experienced
the obvious, increased Gold contamination in the pot, but yields
have also increased. We have stepped-up Pot samples and Pot
changes to overcome this problem.
Is anyone else processing Nickel/Gold plated Printed Wiring
Boards across Wave-Solder and have there been any problems other
then what I have listed above?
Thanks for your time - Harlan
|
|
|
