TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0tcAFR-0000OAC; Tue, 16 Jan 96 06:12 CST
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Tue, 16 Jan 1996 07:14:59 -0500
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
From [log in to unmask] Wed Jan 17 13:
26:55 1996
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/2236
TO:
Return-Path:
X-Status:
X-Loop:
Content-Description:
cc:Mail note part
Subject:
From:
Mime-Version:
1.0
Resent-Message-ID:
<"CC8VG.0.Gi6.aOv-m"@ipc>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
     Doug,
     
     Can you please provide me with contact information for Precision 
     Dispensing Systems?
     
     Thanks in advance.
     
     Paul Thibodeau


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Spray Fluxer
Author:  [log in to unmask] at Internet
Date:    1/15/96 11:57 PM


Parash,
What flux technology are you using?  For low solids fluxes (no cleans) it is 
highly recommended.  The deposition is more controlled and you actually put 
on less flux than a foam fluxer, which is especially useful for water soluble 
fluxes.  There are several varieties out there.  I suggest you consider the 
precision flux dispenser, based on the same technology as ink-jet printers, 
produced by Precision Dispensing Systems.  I can furnish you more info if 
desired.
     
Doug Pauls
[log in to unmask]
     



ATOM RSS1 RSS2