TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0tc3Ox-0000ODC; Mon, 15 Jan 96 22:53 CST
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Mon, 15 Jan 1996 23:57:45 -0500
Precedence:
list
X-Loop:
Message-ID:
From [log in to unmask] Wed Jan 17 13:
26:48 1996
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/2235
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"Qiuwv1.0.UD9.Mzo-m"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
X-Status:
Resent-Sender:
Resent-From:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Parash,
What flux technology are you using?  For low solids fluxes (no cleans) it is
highly recommended.  The deposition is more controlled and you actually put
on less flux than a foam fluxer, which is especially useful for water soluble
fluxes.  There are several varieties out there.  I suggest you consider the
precision flux dispenser, based on the same technology as ink-jet printers,
produced by Precision Dispensing Systems.  I can furnish you more info if
desired.

Doug Pauls
[log in to unmask]



ATOM RSS1 RSS2