 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0u2535-00007vC; Wed, 27 Mar 96 17:54 CST |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 27 Mar 96 15:53:36 PST |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"ZT0LJ1.0.OWC.2LTMn"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Thu Mar 28 11: |
32:59 1996 |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Bruce Wooldridge replied to John R. Kretsch:
In quoting IPC-A-610, "The minimum protrusion requirement is that the lead end
must be visible in the solder"
Here at aerojet, we had a similar problem, except that it was one in that the
connector lead was just long enough to be "flush" with the top of the pad.
(12 layer rigid-flex-rigid, .1 thick)
we used a note- "the lead must be discernable in the solder joint"
Bill Gaines
AeroJet (for $) IHPVA (for speed & fun)
IEPS (for info) SCCA (for trophys)
[log in to unmask]
===================================================
/| _ _ _
/_||_ |_ |
/ ||_ _| |_
===================================================
|
|
|
