TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0u1Yf7-00006lC; Tue, 26 Mar 96 07:19 CST
From [log in to unmask] Thu Mar 28 09:
39:02 1996
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Tue, 26 Mar 96 08:19:31 EST
Precedence:
list
X-Loop:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/3137
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"mXAjD2.0.7T6.qx-Ln"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"Raber, Rick" <[log in to unmask]>
Resent-From:
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
We are a facility that builds several different SMTcircuit card assemblies
(50+).  Presently we are in search of a way of possibly improving throughput
from our screen printing operations.  During the evaluation of this process
we've concluded that the screening of (1) individual cca  at a time contributes
to our problem.  Several of our assemblies are screened in a 10-12 up panel
(12"x18") while others are single boards approx 3"x5".  It's the printing of a
single board which presents a problem.

  Our question; Is there anyone who is fixturing multiple single boards and
printing several with one pass on a screen printer?


Note: Unless someone has existing experience, we are not anticipating using this
process for fine pitch (i.e. 25 mil or less)

Any response is appreciated,

Rick Raber
Supervisor, MFG ENG
ITT Industries - Aerospace/Communications Div.
(219)487-5165
[log in to unmask]



ATOM RSS1 RSS2