 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0u1CBa-00006eC; Mon, 25 Mar 96 07:19 CST |
| Encoding: |
9 TEXT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Mon, 25 Mar 96 07:23:00 CST |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| From [log in to unmask] Mon Mar 25 12: |
41:24 1996 |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"SM9s92.0.9I7.rrfLn"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| X-Mailer: |
Microsoft Mail V3.0 |
| Message-ID: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
What convention is used for calculating the area of a populated assembly
when determining bulk ionic contamination? TM-650 states the area of the
components should be considered. I've heard of people using length X width
X 3. Is there an industry standard?
Bill Barthel
Electronic Assembly Corporation
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|
