 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0tzTlL-00007DC; Wed, 20 Mar 96 13:41 CST |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Wed Mar 20 16: |
03:45 1996 |
| MIME-version: |
1.0 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Content-type: |
TEXT/PLAIN |
| Subject: |
|
| Message-id: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"4WOKR3.0.SoC.oz5Kn"@ipc> |
| From: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 20 Mar 1996 14:42 -0500 (EST) |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
We are presently considering the use of carbon-impregnated
cardboard (for ESD) for the storage of small assemblies with Silver
and Gold Leads.
It is well understood in industry that Sulfur impairs the
solderability of the surface but does anyone know if sulfur has any
other detrimental affects on Silver and Gold finishes (i.e. corrosion,
etc.). These pins will not be soldered therefore solderability of the
surface is not a concern. We just want to confirm there is no other
detrimental affects of Sulfur.
Thanks for your time.
Kevin Frasier
Scientific-Atlanta
[log in to unmask]
http://www.Sciatl.com
|
|
|
