TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0txR0k-00006VC; Thu, 14 Mar 96 22:21 CST
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Wed, 13 Mar 1996 11:14:47 -0500
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
From [log in to unmask] Fri Mar 15 08:
38:48 1996
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/3047
X-Sender:
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"Za1nP.0.kGG.n0FIn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (George Franck X2648 N408)
Resent-Sender:
Mime-Version:
1.0
X-Loop:
Message-Id:
<v01510102ad6ca0b9848d@[11.18.1.8]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Please help me resolve a design issue.

The board will be assemblied using solderpaste, pick and place, surface
mount assembly (both sides).  The design has .0135" vias hole centers less
than .030" from surface mount pads.  The via and pad is connected with a
short .008" wide trace.  There is no soldermask dam between the surface
mount pad and the via hole.  Board is a 4 layer .062, which has soldermask
already on the board.

Any assembly concerns?  Should there be a soldermask dam between the land
and via?  What guidelines do you use/like ?

Thanks for your input


  ====================================================================
                           George Franck
  PWB Product Assurance                     Phone (703) 560-5000 x2648
  E-Systems M/S N408                              Fax   (703) 280-4613
  7700 Arlington Blvd                  E-Mail: [log in to unmask]
  Falls Church Va 22046                      E-Mail: [log in to unmask]
  ====================================================================




ATOM RSS1 RSS2