 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0twvFR-00006VC; Wed, 13 Mar 96 12:26 CST |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 13 Mar 96 10:01:00 PST |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"vSEmq.0.1yE.0DnHn"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Wed Mar 13 14: |
53:30 1996 |
| cc: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Is there any evidence that relates the gloss of solder masks to
solderballs?
I have read several articles that state that the solderballs are
drastically reduced if the gloss reading is less than 32 (at 85 deg.
setting on a glossmeter).
Does anyone have any experience with this method?
|
|
|
